Frameworks behind a priority

Attach the standards a priority is actually judged against.

Last updated September 22, 2026

Some priorities are judged against a published standard. A compliance program is the obvious case, but customer requirements and market entry often come with a named framework attached too.

Attaching a framework

Select the frameworks a priority is measured against and Pytheus shows readiness against that framework's requirements alongside your own capability view. The two answer different questions: your capability view says how mature you are, the framework view says whether you meet somebody else's bar.

What the readiness view can and cannot tell you

Framework readiness is derived from your capability assessment through a published mapping between capabilities and requirements. It tells you where you are clearly short and where you are plausibly covered. It is not an audit, it does not produce an attestation, and it will not tell you that you have passed.

Controls are labeled with the confidence of the mapping behind them. Where a mapping is still under validation, the surface says so rather than implying a certainty it does not have. See Framework readiness.

Not every framework is available to every organization

The frameworks you can select depend on what your organization has enabled. If a standard you need is missing, your Pytheus contact can tell you where it sits.

Next: Turning a priority into a plan.

Frameworks behind a priority · Pytheus Docs